"Quórum Teológico" es un blog abierto al desarrollo del pensamiento humano y desea ser un medio que contribuya al diálogo y la discusión de los temas expuestos por los diferentes contribuyentes a la misma. "Quórum Teológico", no se hace responsable del contenido de los artículos expuesto y solo es responsabilidad de sus autores.

Ya puedes traducir esta página a cualquier idioma

Déjanos tu mensaje en este Chat

Francis of Assisi, Friar, 4 October 1226.

Francis was born in 1182, the son of a wealthy cloth merchant. His early years were frivolous, but an experience of sickness and another of military service were instrumental in leading him to reflect on the purpose of life. One day, in the church of San Damiano, he seemed to hear Christ saying to him, "Francis, repair my falling house." He took the words literally, and sold a bale of silk from his father's warehouse to pay for repairs to the church of San Damiano. His father was outraged, and there was a public confrontation at which his father disinherited and disowned him, and he in turn renounced his father's wealth--one account says that he not only handed his father his purse, but also took off his expensive clothes, laid them at his father's feet, and walked away naked. He declared himself "wedded to Lady Poverty", renounced all material possessions, and devoted himself to serving the poor. In his day the most dreaded of all diseases was something known as leprosy. (It is probably not the same as either the modern or the Biblical disease of that name.) Lepers were kept at a distance and regarded with fear and disgust. Francis cared for them, fed them, bathed their sores, and kissed them. Since he could not pay for repairs to the Church of San Damiano, he undertook to repair it by his own labors. He moved in with the priest, and begged stones lying useless in fields, shaping them for use in repairing the church. He got his meals, not by asking for money so that he might live at the expense of others, but by scrounging crusts and discarded vegetable from trash-bins, and by working as a day laborer, insisting on being paid in bread, milk, eggs, or vegetables rather than in money. Soon a few companions joined him. Dante in his Paradiso has Aquinas say of him:

Let me tell you of a youth whose aristocratic father disowned him because of his love for a beautiful lady. She had been married before, to Christ, and was so faithful a spouse to Him that, while Mary only stood at the foot of the Cross, she leaped up to be with Him on the Cross. These two of whom I speak are Francis and the Lady Poverty. As they walked along together, the sight of their mutual love drew men's hearts after them. Bernard saw them and ran after them, kicking off his shoes to run faster to so great a peace. Giles and Sylvester saw them, kicked off their shoes and ran to join them....
After three years, in 1210, the Pope authorized the forming of the Order of Friars Minor, commonly called the Franciscans. ("Friar" means "brother," as in "fraternity", and "minor" means "lesser" or "younger." I take the meaning to be that a Franciscan, meeting another Christian, is to think, "I am your brother in Christ, and your younger brother at that, bound to defer to you and to give you precedence over myself."

Francis and his companions took literally the words of Christ when he sent his disciples out to preach (Matthew 10:7-10):

Preach as you go, saying, "The kingdom of Heaven is at hand." ... You have received the Gospel without payment, give it to others as freely. Take no gold, or silver, or copper in your belts, no bag for your journey, no spare garment, nor sandals, nor staff.
They would have no money, and no property, individually or collectively. Their task was to preach, "using words if necessary," but declaring by word and action the love of God in Christ. Francis was partial to a touch of the dramatic (see his parting from his father, for example), and it was probably he who set up the first Christmas manger scene, to bring home the Good News of God made man for our salvation, home to men's hearts and imaginations as well as to their intellects.
In 1219, Francis went to the Holy Land to preach to the moslems. He was given a pass through the enemy lines, and spoke to the Sultan, Melek-al-Kamil. Francis proclaimed the Gospel to the Sultan, who replied that he had his own beliefs, and that moslems were as firmly convinced of the truth of Islam as Francis was of the truth of Christianity. Francis proposed that a fire be built, and that he and a moslem volunteer would walk side by side into the fire to show whose faith was stronger. The Sultan said he was not sure that a moslem volunteer could be found. Francis then offered to walk into the fire alone. The Sultan who was deeply impressed but remained unconverted. Francis proposed an armistice between the two warring sides, and drew up terms for one; the Sultan agreed, but, to Francis's deep disappointment, the Christian leaders would not. Francis returned to Italy, but a permanent result was that the Franciscans were given custody of the Christian shrines then in moslem hands.
Back in Italy and neighboring countries, the Order was suffering from its own success. Then, as now, many persons were deeply attracted by Francis and his air of joy, abandonment, and freedom. What is overlooked is that these were made possible only by his willingness to accept total poverty, not picturesque poverty but real dirt, rags, cold, and hunger, and lepers with real pus oozing from their sores and a real danger of infection. Many idealistic young men were joining the Order in a burst of enthusiasm and then finding themselves not so sure that such extremes of poverty were really necessary. When there were only a few friars, they were all known to Francis personally, and the force of his personality kept the original ideals of the Order alive in them. Now that the Order was larger, this was no longer enough. In 1220 Francis resigned as minister-general of the Order, and in 1221 he agreed to a new and modified rule, which he did not approve, but could not resist. He died on 4 October 1226. The Franciscan split into the Conventual Franciscans, who held a limited amount of property in common, and the Spiritual Franciscans, who disavowed all property. They taught that Christ and the twelve apostles had held no property, singly or jointly. This view offended those who held property, and was declared to be heretical (proof text, John 18:10; Jesus said to Peter, "Put up thy sword...."). In 1318, several Spiritual Franciscans were burned at the stake in Marseilles.
A story is told of the days when the friars first began to have permanent houses. A beggar came by when Brother Juniper was at the gate and asked for a little money. Brother Juniper said, "There is no money in the house. But wait a minute. Last week someone gave us an altar cloth with little silver bells attached. We don't need those. I will cut them off for you. They will be as good as money." And he did. When the sacristan learned what had happened, he complained to the prior, who said, "We are fortunate that he did not give away the cloth itself. But send him to me, and I will scold him." Brother Juniper came, and the prior scolded him until he was hoarse. Brother Juniper noticed that the prior was hoarse, and went to the kitchen and cooked him some mint sauce. He brought it to the prior, who had gone to bed. He said, "Father Prior, get up and eat this mint sauce. It will be good for your throat." The prior said, "I don't want any mint sauce. Go away and let me sleep." Brother Juniper said, "It's good sauce, and will be good for your throat." The prior said, "Go away, I don't want it." Brother Juniper said, "Well, if you won't eat it, how about holding the candle while I eat it?" This was too much for the prior. He got up and they both ate.
From the first known letter from Francis to all Christians:
"O how happy and blessed are those who love the Lord and do as the Lord himself said in the gospel: You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart and your whole soul, and your neighbor as yourself. Thereofore, let us love God and adore him with pure heart and mind. This is his particular desire when he says: True worshipers adore the Father in spirit and truth. For all who adore him must do so in the spirit of truth. Let us also direct to him our praises and prayers, saying: "Our Father, who are in heaven," since we must always pray and never grow slack.
Furthermore, let us produce worthy fruits of penance. Let us also love our neightbors as ourselves. Let us have charity and humility. Let us give alms because these cleanse our souls from the stains of sin. Men lose all the material things they leave behind in this world, but they carry with them the reward of their charity and the alms they give. For these they will recieve from the Lord the reward and recompense they deserve. We must not be wise and prudent according to the flesh. Rather we must be sinple, humble and pure. We should never desire to be over others. Instead, we ought to be servants who are submissive toe very human being for God's sake. The Spirit of the Lord will rest on all who live in this way and persevere in it to the end. He will permanently dwell in them. They will be the Father's children who do his work. They are the spouses, brothers and mothers of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Many readers are enthusiastic about Saint Francis of Assisi, a biography of Francis by G.K.Chesterton. A reader of these essays has also recommended Saint Francis of Assisi, a Biography by Omer Englebert.


Andrea Bocelli Vivere Live in Tuscany

La geopolítica de la crisis de refugiados musulmanes de Myanmar

Nazanin Armanian
www.publico.es / 140917

Decenas de miles de los vecinos de Rohinya, de religión musulmana, están huyendo despavoridos de sus hogares a causa de la violencia extrema ejercida por el ejército y los paramilitares budistas. Miles de personas se han quedado en la frontera de Bangladesh, que niega a acogerlos porque “hay terroristas infiltrados entre ellos”. Se trata de una nueva fórmula del castigo colectivo a un pueblo ya castigado.

La prensa de masa occidental y la de los países musulmanes acusan a los budistas de limpieza étnica, y señalan a Suu Kei, ministra de exteriores, de pasividad y de ser cómplice de los crímenes cometidos por “los budistas”, que no los generales que siguen ostentando el verdadero poder en Myanmar.

¿Qué interés tendrán para presentar este conflicto como étnico-religioso? ¿Por qué destacan el drama de estas personas mientras silencian el de 17 millones de yemeníes o los siete millones de sudaneses que soportan, desde hace varios años, la suma de terror, violación, tortura, hambre, sed, desesperación y otras atrocidades ante la total pasividad de la comunidad internacional?

Por su parte, el gobierno de Myanmar y los medios prochinos minimizan la envergadura de la crisis y culpan a los “terroristas bengalíes”, o lo que es lo mismo, a la Organización Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) de haber provocado la tensión, asaltando el 25 de agosto a varias comisarías y puestos militares y asesinar a varios agentes.
Sin embargo, entre las causas del conflicto “interno” de un país que comparte frontera con China no podía faltar el determinante factor geopolítico.

¿Quiénes son los rohingyás?

Myanmar es un país de 52 millones de habitantes, de los que 1,1 millones son rohingyás, que llevan el nombre del Estado en el que habitan. Son descendientes de los trabajadores bengalíes que llegaron a Birmania a partir del siglo XV, y hoy son una de las decenas de grupos étnico-religiosos (que hablan cerca de 100 idiomas y dialectos), que viven bajo el dominio de una mayoría de budistas de la etnia Bamar, y posiblemente de origen mongol. A pesar de los inmensos recursos naturales, Myanmar ocupa el puesto 150 de los 187 países en el Índice de Desarrollo Humano: sólo el 26% de sus gentes tiene acceso a la electricidad.

Salvo el corto periodo del gobierno del presidente Ne Win (1962 y 1988), que dirigió la República Socialista de la Unión de Birmania, los rohingyás y otras minorías del país como Karen, Kachin (cristiana) o Shan, han sido perseguidos y condenados a una extrema pobreza. Los budistas supremacistas han destruido mezquitas pero también iglesias y templos hinduistas de los inmigrantes indios.

Desde el golpe de estado militar del 1988, el ejército se ha hecho dueño directo de los recursos del país: sus fértiles tierras, agua, petróleo y minería, y el 30 de marzo de 2012 tras anular la Ley de Tierra del 1963 -aprobada por el gobierno socialista que protegía a los pequeños propietarios y los derechos de los cultivadores de la tierra-, abrieron el mercado a las corporaciones extranjeras para arruinar el país. Esta dinámica intensifica aún más el proceso de la expulsión de los campesinos (en su mayoría budistas) de sus tierras por los comandantes militares regionales y sus protegidos paramilitares.

Los militares también controlan el negocio de opio. De hecho, hoy Myanmar es el segundo productor mundial de opio después de que Afganistán, a partir de su ocupación por la OTAN en 2002 se convirtiera en el primero. También en Myanmar (y Laos y Tailandia, el llamado “Triángulo de Oro” de opio y heroína) EEUU utilizó la droga para financiar al Kuomintang, un partido fascista que luchaba contra las fuerzas de Mao Zedong.

A esta involución se añadió la suspensión de la ley que otorgaba ciudadanía a los musulmanes rohingyás, lo cual atizó el fuego de la batalla entre los desahuciados: a los budistas empobrecidos se les dejó atacar y expulsar de sus casas y tierras a los musulmanes pobres.

En mismo año 2012 aparece la insurgencia islamista ARSA, integrada por varios centenares de los 500.000 rohingyás emigrados a Pakistán, y entrenados como yihadistas por el régimen del general Ziaul Haq y la CIA para luchar contra el gobierno socialista de Afganistán. La ausencia de una información objetiva e imparcial imposibilita conocer el papel real de esta organización en la actual crisis.

El pulso entre China y EEUU

El país más grande del sudeste asiático y con inmensas tierras cultivables y agua, Myanmar, se encuentra entre dos estados más poblados del mundo, China e India, necesitados de recursos naturales, aunque el verdadero rival de China en este escenario es EEUU.
Para China, Myanmar con el que tiene 2.204 kilómetros frontera, es como México para EEUU. Pekín hasta el 2015 –fecha de la instalación del gobierno de Suu Kyi, patrocinado por EEUU-, además de mantener una amplia relación con el régimen militar birmano, también ha cuidado del Ejército del Estado de Wa Unido (UWSA), la organización armada étnica más fuerte de Myanmar, y uno de los grupos nacidos de la desintegración del Partido Comunista de Birmania en 1989. Que China patrocinara a un grupo para hacer avanzar su agenda en un país (hacer de “proxy”) es nuevo en la política exterior china. Paralelamente, el gobierno del presidente Xi, con el fin de aumentar su influencia política en el país y poner fin a la larga guerra civil birmana, ha organizado encuentros entre el gobierno de Suu Kyi y los grupos rebeldes. En cuanto a las relaciones comerciales, China es el primer socio de Myanmar, y ha invertido unos mil millones de dólares en las infraestructuras del país vecino. En abril pasado inauguraron unos oleoductos que atraviesan Myanmar y alcanza el suroeste de China, aumentando la seguridad energética de China. “Curiosamente” el Estado Rohingya es donde empiezan estas tuberías en la Bahía de Bengala.

China, que no votó al comunicado del 5 de septiembre de la ONU, que a propuesta de EEUU, condenaba la “limpieza étnica” de los musulmanes rohingyás, teme que esta “sensibilidad” sea el inicio de un plan para sabotear los oleoductos chinos, e impedir la construcción del puerto Kyaukpyu que forma parte del proyecto de la Nueva Ruta de la Seda (“One Belt, One Road”). Este puerto, al igual que el puerto Gwadar paquistaní alquilado por China, es vital para el gigante asiático, que hoy realiza gran parte de su transporte comercial por el congestionado estrecho de Malaka, y le permitirá importar el hidrocarburo desde el Golfo Pérsico a China. Que los corredores marítimos vitales pasan a través de aguas disputadas o bloqueados, obliga a Pekín a conseguir un acceso directo al Océano Índico, y sólo puede hacerlo a través de Pakistán y Myanmar. Washington teme que estos puertos sirvan también de base naval para su gran rival.

Por lo que Barak Obama, que planeó rodear a China con bases militares, no sólo llevó a su protegida Suu Kyi al poder, sino que fue el primer presidente de EEUU que visitó el país, en 2012, y volvió de nuevo en 2014 para atraerlo a su órbita con acuerdos comerciales y militares.

En marzo del 2017, un buque de la marina de EEUU, el Comando Militar, de Navegación Marítima visitó un puerto de Myanmar por primera desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

El cambio de rumbo en la política exterior de EEUU con la administración Trump y su obsesión por Irán ha permitido a los chinos respirar con algo de tranquilidad, aunque esta ‘crisis de refugiados musulmanes’ puede convertirse en su pesadilla. EEUU preferirá un Myanmar destruido y sumido en la guerra civil a que se convirtiera en un puente para la expansión de la influencia china. Mientras, el régimen militar birmano desvía la atención de la lucha de clases hacia un conflicto étnico-religioso entre los desahuciados budistas y musulmanes.

Antes de que Myanmar se desmorone en caos y desastre, hay que forzar al ejército de retirarse del estado de rohingyás, poner fin a la matanza de sus gentes y garantizar sus derechos federales.