"Quórum Teológico" es un blog abierto al desarrollo del pensamiento humano y desea ser un medio que contribuya al diálogo y la discusión de los temas expuestos por los diferentes contribuyentes a la misma. "Quórum Teológico", no se hace responsable del contenido de los artículos expuesto y solo es responsabilidad de sus autores.

Ya puedes traducir esta página a cualquier idioma

Déjanos tu mensaje en este Chat

Clement of Rome, bishop, 23 November 100

Clement is counted as the third bishop of Rome (after the apostles). His predecessors are Linus and Cletus (or Anacletus, or Anencletus), about whom almost nothing is known. They are simply names on a list. Clement is a little more than this, chiefly because he wrote a letter to the Corinthians, which was highly valued by the early church, and has been preserved to the present day. The letter itself does not carry his name, but is merely addressed from the congregation at Rome to the congregation at Corinth. However, a letter from Corinth to Rome a few decades later refers to "the letter we received from your bishop Clement, which we still read regularly." Other early writers are unanimous in attributing the letter to Clement. Perhaps because this letter made his name familiar, he has had an early anonymous sermon (commonly called II Clement) attributed to him, and is a character in some early religious romances (e.g. the Clementine Recognitions).

One story about Clement is that he was put to death by being tied to an anchor and thrown into the sea. Accordingly, he is often depicted with an anchor, and many churches in port towns intended to minister chiefly to mariners are named for him.

The Epistle of Clement to The Corinthians (also called I Clement) can be found in collections of the writings of the Apostolic Fathers, such as the Penguin Paperback Early Christian Writings, translated by Maxwell Staniforth. The letter is commonly dated around 96 AD, but an earlier date is suggested by John Robinson in his Redating the New Testament.

The letter is occasioned by the fact that a group of Christians at Corinth had banded together against their leaders and had deposed them from office. Clement writes to tell them that they have behaved badly, and to remind them of the importance of Christian unity and love. He speaks at length of the way in which each kind of official in the church has his own function for the good of the whole. The letter is an important witness to the early Christian understanding of Church government, but an ambiguous witness in that we are never told precisely why the Corinthians had deposed their leaders, and therefore the letter can be read as saying that presbyters ought not to be deposed without reasonable grounds, or as saying that they cannot be deposed on any grounds at all.

The letter refers only to the presbyters of Corinth, and makes no reference to the bishop of Corinth. Moreover, there is no mention of a bishop at Rome--the letter is sent as from the Church at Rome collectively, and Clement's name does not appear. From this, some have inferred that the office of bishop had not yet developed at either Rome or Corinth, and that in both congregations the office of presbyter was the highest office known. A probable alternate explanation, however, is that the troubles in Corinth had arisen when the bishop of that congregation had died, and the congregation had split into factions, none containing both a majority of the presbyters and a majority of the congregation.

The letter makes no apology for intervening in what might be thought an internal affair of the congregation at Corinth. On the contrary, the writer apologizes for the delay in commenting, as if an earlier intervention might have been expected. From this, some have inferred that, even at this early date (96 AD or, some think, earlier), when the Apostle John was perhaps still alive, the authority and jurisdiction of the Roman congregation over every other congregation of the Christian Church was already universally conceded. However, a perfectly reasonable alternative explanation is that the congregation at Corinth, torn by division, had agreed to settle their disputes by inviting another congregation, or the head of another congregation, to act as arbitrator. This would be a reasonable thing to do, and the choice of Rome as that congregation was natural, partly because of the prestige of the city, and the prestige of one of the largest congregations in the Church, and because the Corinth of Clement's day had been built as a Roman colony, with a special dependence directly on the city of Rome (a civil relation that might affect the habits of thought of the Corinthians on matters ecclestiastical as well), but also because Rome was far enough away so that it could be assumed to be impartial and not affected by local personalities.

From Clement's Letter to the Corinthians:
Let the one truly possessed by the love of Christ keep his commandments. Who can express the binding power of divine love? Who can find words for the splendor of its beauty? Beyond all description are the heights to which it lifts us. Love unites us to God; "it cancels innumerable sins," has no limits to its endurance, bears everything patiently. Love is neither servile nor arrogant. It does not provoke schisms or form cliques, but always acts in harmony with others. By it all God's chosen ones have been sanctified; without it, it is impossible to please him. Out of love the Lord took us to himself; because he loved us and it was God's will, our Lord Jesus Christ gave his life's blood for us -- he gave his body for our body, his soul for our soul. 
See then, beloved, what a great and wonderful thing love is, and how inexpressible its perfection. Who are worthy to possess it unless God makes them so? To him therefore we must turn, begging of his mercy that there may be found in us a love free from human partiality and beyond reproach. Every generation from Adam's time to ours has passed away; but those who by God's grace were made perfect in love and have a dwelling now among the saints, and when at last the kingdom of Christ appears, they will be revealed. "Take shelter in your rooms for a little while," says Scripture, "until my wrath subsides. Then I will remember the good days, and will raise you from your graves." 
Happy are we, beloved, if love enables us to live in harmony and in the observance of God's commandments, for then it will also gain for us the remission of our sins. Scripture pronounces "happy those whose transgressions are pardoned, whose sins are forgiven. Happy the one," it says, "to whom the Lord imputes no fault, on whose lips there is no guile." This is the blessing given those whom God has chosen through Jesus Christ our Lord. To him be glory for ever and ever.


Let us fix our attention on the blood of Christ and recognize how precious it is to God his Father, since it was shed for our salvation and brought the grace of repentance to all the world. 
If we review the various ages of history, we will see that in every generation the Lord has "offered the opportunity of repentance" to any who were willing to turn to him. When Noah preached God's message of repentance, all who listened to him were saved. Jonah told the Ninevites they were going to be destroyed, but when they repented, their prayers gained God's forgiveness for their sins, and they were saved, even though they were not of God's people. 
Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the ministers of God's grace have spoken of repentance; indeed, the Master of the whole universe himself spoke of repentance with an oath: "As I live," says the Lord, "I do not wish the death of the sinner but the sinner's repentance." He added this evidence of his goodness: "House of Israel, repent of your wickedness. Tell my people: If their sins should reach from earth to heaven, if they are brighter than scarlet and blacker than sackcloth, you need only turn to me with your whole heart and say, `Father,' and I will listen to you as to a holy people." 
In other words, God wanted all his beloved ones to have the opportunity to repent and he confirmed this desire by his own almighty will. That is why we should obey his sovereign and glorious will and prayerfully entreat his mercy and kindness. We should be suppliant before him and turn to his compassion, rejecting empty works and quarreling and jealousy which only lead to death. 
We should be humble in mind, putting aside all arrogance, pride, and foolish anger. Rather, we should act in accordance with the Scriptures, as the Holy Spirit says: "The wise must not glory in wisdom nor the strong in strength nor the rich in riches. Rather, let the one who glories glory in the Lord, by seeking him and doing what is right and just." Recall especially what the Lord Jesus said when he taught gentleness and forbearance. "Be merciful," he said, "so that you may have mercy shown to you. Forgive, so that you may be forgiven. As you treat others, so you will be treated. As you give, so you will receive. As you judge, so you will be judged. As you are kind to others, so you will be treated kindly. The measure of your giving will be the measure of your receiving." 
Let these commandments and precepts strengthen us to live in humble obedience to his sacred words. As Scripture asks: "Whom shall I look upon with favor except the humble, peaceful one who trembles at my words?" 
Sharing then in the heritage of so many vast and glorious achievements, let us hasten toward the goal of peace, set before us from the beginning. Let us keep our eyes firmly fixed on the Father and Creator of the whole universe, and hold fast to his splendid and transcendent gifts of peace and all his blessings.

Convocatorias - Ciudad del Saber

Dionysius of Alexandria, bishop and scholar, 21 November 265

Dionysius was a pupil of Origen in the great catechetical school in Alexandria, and then headed that school himself for fourteen years. In 247 he was made bishop of Alexandria. Persecution soon after broke out, and he directed his church from hiding for several years, until the death of the Emperor Decian in 251. In the period of peace that followed, Dionysius was a zealous supporter of lenient treatment for the lapsed (those who had renounced the faith under pressure, and now wished to be received back into the Church). His seventeen years as a bishop were turbulent ones, during which Alexandria suffered civil strife, plague, and famine, and the church was subject to repeated persecutions. He died on 17 November 265.


Dionysius was a scholar, a keen student of pagan as well as Christian learning.

Faced with the rise of certain dissident theological views in his diocese, he proceeded, not by excommunication, but by challenging his opponents to a public debate, with the thirty of them on one side and himself on the other. The debate lasted three days, by the end of which time he had talked all thirty of his opponents round to his side.

Only a few of his considerable writings have survived. One detail that I have encountered in a Bible commentary is his judgement that the book of Revelation had a different author from the Gospel of John, a view which he based on differences in the style of writing and other internal evidence. (The reader is reminded that the writer of the book of Revelation tells us that his name is John, but not that he is the Apostle of that name, so that Dionysius cannot be said to be contradicting the Bible.)

Semana de Actividades del 20 al 24 de Noviembre de Capital Financiero

* Desde este lunes 20 de noviembre Panamá cuenta con su “sello orgánico”, para los productos provenientes de sistemas de producción sostenible y con un manejo racional de los recursos naturales, informó el Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario. 

* La Unión Nacional de Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas (Unpyme) llevará a cabo los días 20, 21 y 22 de noviembre el Congreso de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa, de 2 a 8 p.m., en el Centro Vasco Núñez de Balboa del hotel El Panamá.

* Este 21 de noviembre, a las 12 p.m., se realizará la presentación del tema “Ventajas, incentivos actividades y demás consideraciones sobre zonas francas”, en la sede de la Cámara Americana de Comercio e Industrias de Panamá (PanAmCham).

* Este 22 de noviembre se hará el conversatorio “#Smartcity Panamá Movilidad Urbana”, en la sede de la PanAmCham, de 7:30 a 11 a.m., en el hotel Wyndham de Albrook.

* La Asociación Panameña de Ejecutivos de Empresa (Apede) realizará este 23 de noviembre la presentación del análisis “Aumento del salario mínimo versus productividad laboral”, a las 12 p.m., en su edificio sede.

* Este 23 de noviembre se llevará a cabo el evento “Networking Mujeres Líderes”, a las 6:00 p.m., en el hotel InterContinental Miramar Panamá. La actividad, en la que más de 40 empresas lideradas por mujeres expondrán sus productos y servicios, es organizada por la Cámara de Comercio, Industrias y Agricultura de Panamá.
.
A tener en cuenta
  • China || Este 22 de noviembre concluye la primera gira oficial que realiza el presidente panameño Juan C. Varela a la República Popular China desde el establecimiento de las relaciones diplomáticas en junio de 2017. Ambos países firmaron 19 acuerdos.

Choque de civilizaciones 2

Thierry Meyssan

Desde hace 16 años, los expertos en política internacional se han implicado en numerosos debates tratando de determinar los objetivos de la estrategia de Estados Unidos. Por supuesto, después de todo ese tiempo, hoy resulta más fácil ver las cosas con claridad que al principio de esta etapa. Sin embargo, pocos lo logran y muchos persisten en seguir defiendo teorías ya desmentidas por los hechos. Basándose en las conclusiones de ese debate, Thierry Meyssan recuerda cuál es la siguiente etapa prevista para los ejércitos de Estados Unidos, según sus teóricos de antes de este periodo, una etapa cuya puesta en marcha puede comenzar próximamente.

Las fuerzas que concibieron y planificaron la destrucción del «Medio Oriente ampliado» [también llamado “Gran Medio Oriente”] consideraban esta región un laboratorio donde podían poner a prueba su nueva estrategia. En 2001, esas fuerzas incluían a los gobiernos de Estados Unidos, del Reino Unido y de Israel, pero hoy han perdido el poder político en Washington y ahora prosiguen su proyecto económico-militar a través de empresas transnacionales privadas.

Esas fuerzas concibieron su estrategia alrededor de los trabajos realizados, por un lado, por el almirante Arthur Cebrowski y su asistente Thomas Barnett en el Pentágono y, por otro lado, de los trabajos que realizaron Bernard Lewis y su asistente Samuel Huntington en el Consejo de Seguridad Nacional [1].

El objetivo de esas fuerzas era a la vez adaptar su dominación a la evolución de las técnicas y la economía contemporáneas y extender esa dominación a los países del antiguo bloque soviético. En el pasado, Washington controlaba la economía mundial a través del mercado mundial de la energía. Para eso, imponía el dólar como moneda de uso obligado en cualquier contrato vinculado al petróleo, utilizando la amenaza de guerra contra todo el que no se plegara a esa obligación. Pero ese método no podía mantenerse en una época en la que el gas proveniente de Rusia, Irán, Qatar y –en poco tiempo– de Siria sustituye parcialmente el petróleo.

Retomando los orígenes criminales de gran parte de los colonos estadounidenses, esas fuerzas concibieron la idea de dominar a los países ricos extorsionándolos. Para tener acceso no sólo a las fuentes de energías fósiles sino también a las materias primas en general, los “Estados estables” (incluyendo a los ex soviéticos) tendrían que recurrir a la «protección» del ejército de Estados Unidos y, en ciertos casos, quizás a las fuerzas armadas del Reino Unido e Israel.

Para lograrlo bastaría con dividir el mundo en dos, globalizar las economías solventes y destruir toda capacidad de resistencia en el resto del mundo.

Esta visión del mundo es radicalmente diferente a las que prevalecían en el Imperio británico y el sionismo. Pero imponer ese cambio de paradigma sólo podía lograrse con una fuerte movilización, originada por un shock sicológico, un «nuevo Pearl Harbor». Eso fue el 11 de septiembre de 2001.

Si bien se trata de un proyecto que puede parecer demasiado delirante y cruel, hoy podemos observar al mismo tiempo que –16 años después– es efectivamente lo que está aplicándose y que además ese proyecto está encontrando obstáculos inesperados.

La globalización económica de los países solventes era prácticamente total cuando uno de ellos, Rusia, se opuso militarmente a la destrucción de las capacidades de resistencia en Siria y, posteriormente, a la integración forzada de Ucrania a la economía global. Washington y Londres ordenaron por tanto a sus aliados la aplicación de sanciones económicas contra Moscú y con ello interrumpieron el proceso de globalización de las economías solventes.

Al iniciar su proyecto de «rutas de la seda», China invirtió considerablemente en países que estaban destinados a la destrucción. Las fuerzas promotoras del «nuevo mapa del mundo» reaccionaron creando un Estado terrorista que bloquea la antigua Ruta de la Seda en Irak y en Siria y convirtiendo en guerra la cuestión ucraniana, lo cual bloquea el trazado original de la segunda ruta de la seda.

Esas fuerzas se proponen actualmente extender el caos a una segunda región, el sudeste asiático. Al menos es hacia esa parte del mundo que están migrando los yihadistas, según el Comité Antiterrorista de la ONU [2]. Con ese traslado, esas fuerzas cierran el episodio 2012-2016 en el Medio Oriente –aunque eso no implica que no pueda estallar una guerra alrededor de los kurdos– y preparan la destrucción del sudeste asiático.

Sería esa la segunda etapa del «choque de civilizaciones». Después de los musulmanes contra los «judeocristianos» (sic) [3], ahora serán musulmanes contra budistas.


[1] Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority, David S. Alberts, John J. Garstka y Frederick P. Stein, CCRP, 1999. The Pentagon’s New Map, Thomas P. M. Barnett, Putnam Publishing Group, 2004. «The Roots of Muslim Rage», Bernard Lewis, Atlantic Monthly, septiembre de 1990. «The Clash of Civilizations?» y «The West Unique, Not Universal», Samuel Huntington, Foreign Affairs, 1993 y 1996; The Soldier and the State y The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Samuel Huntington, Harvard 1957 y Simon and Schulster 1996.
[2] «Daesh parece estar migrando hacia el sudeste asiático», Red Voltaire, 8 de octubre de 2017.
[3] Hasta los años 1990, el término judeocristianos designaba solamente la comunidad de los judíos convertidos al cristianismo alrededor de Jacobo el Justo [primer obispo de Jerusalén, también llamado Santiago el Justo], comunidad disuelta después del saqueo de Jerusalén por los romanos. Sin embargo, como los cristianos occidentales siguen confiriendo un papel muy importante al Antiguo Testamento en su práctica religiosa, defienden –a menudo sin ni siquiera darse cuenta– puntos de vista judíos en vez de los puntos de vista cristianos. Por el contrario, los cristianos del Oriente, fieles a la tradición de sus predecesores, se refieren muy raramente a las escrituras judías y se niegan a leerlas durante la eucaristía.


Un “mar de basura” invade las costas de Centroamérica

Cubadebate
30 octubre 2017

Un mar de cepillos de dientes, tenedores, cucharas, platos y botellas de plástico. Esa es la imagen que ha captado la fotógrafa y activista británica Caroline Power entre las islas de Roatán y Cayos Cochinos, en el Caribe hondureño. “Ver que se asesine y asfixie lentamente algo que me importa tanto fue devastador”, ha dicho Power al diario británico The Telegraph.



 “Esto tiene que detenerse, piensen en sus vidas diarias. ¿Cómo se llevaron a casa la comida sobrante la última vez que comieron en un restaurante? Es probable que [el envoltorio] fuera espuma de poliestireno, se sirviera con un tenedor de plástico y luego la pusieran en una bolsa de plástico”, escribió Power en Facebook.

La publicación, del pasado 16 de octubre, ha sido compartida unas tres mil veces y ha tenido más de mil 100 reacciones en esa red social.
La fotógrafa, que se especializa en imágenes submarinas, ha explicado que el hallazgo se produjo durante un viaje de buceo a unos islotes que son conocidos porque apenas rebasan el nivel del agua y permiten a las exploraciones avistamientos “prístinos”. “Observar la basura y los desechos fue descorazonador”, ha detallado la fotógrafa.

La organización ambientalista Blue Planet Society argumentó que la causa del llamado “mar de plástico” es la basura arrastrada por el fronterizo río Motagua desde Guatemala a las costas hondureñas. Ambos países han tenido roces en los últimos tres años por la contaminación del afluente.

“El Gobierno de Honduras lamenta que a pesar de los distintos acercamientos ante el Gobierno de Guatemala y los esfuerzos que se han venido realizando, los mismos no han sido suficientes (…) y aún no se ven resultados concretos y palpables”, expresó la Secretaría hondureña de Relaciones Exteriores en un comunicado que se divulgó el pasado 23 de octubre.


Tegucigalpa ha exigido la mitigación de los daños y una indemnización por “la inversión que el Gobierno ha realizado”. El presidente guatemalteco, Jimmy Morales, ha dicho al diario Prensa Libre que habló con su homólogo hondureño sobre las tareas para combatir este problema, pero que “aún no están definidas”.

Edmund of East Anglia, king and martyr, 20 November 870

When the heathen Anglo-Saxons invaded Christian Britain in the 400's, they eventually established seven kingdoms: Essex, Wessex, Sussex (East Saxons, West Saxons, and South Saxons), Mercia, Northumbria, and East Anglia (three kingdoms of the Angles), and the Jute kingdom of Kent. (The borders between these ancient kingdoms are still borders between regions speaking English with different accents today.) Under the influence of missionaries from the Celts and from continental Europe, these peoples bcame Christian, only to be faced themselves by a wave of heathen invaders.

Edmund was born about 840, became King of East Anglia in about 855, and in 870 faced a horde of marauding Danes, who moved through the countryside, burning churches and slaughtering villages wholesale. On reaching East Anglia, their leaders confronted Edmund and offered him peace on condition that he would rule as their vassal and forbid the practice of the Christian faith. Edmund refused this last condition, fought, and was captured. He was ill-treated and killed. His burial place is the town of Bury St. Edmunds.

Elizabeth of Hungary, princess and philanthropist, 19 November 1231

The numerous "St. Elizabeth's Hospitals" throughout the world are for the most part named, not for the Biblical Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, but for this princess of Hungary. She was concerned for the relief of the poor and the sick, and with her husband's consent she used her dowry money for their relief. During a famine and epidemic in 1226, while her husband was away in Italy, she sold her jewels and established a hospital where she nursed the sick, and opened the royal granaries to feed the hungry. 

After her husband's death in 1227, her inlaws, who opposed her "extravagances," expelled her from Wartburg. Finally an arrangement was negotiated with them that gave her a stipend. She became a Franciscan tertiary (lay associate) and devoted the remainder of her life to nursing and charity. She sewed garments to clothe the poor, and went fishing to feed them.

Hilda of Whitby, abbess and peacemaker, 18 November 680

Hilda (known in her own century as "Hild") was the grandniece of King Edwin of Northumbria, (see 12 Oct) a kingdom of the Angles. She was born in 614 and baptized in 627 when the king and his household became Christians. In 647 she decided to become a nun, and under the direction of Aidan (see 31 Aug) she established several monasteries. Her last foundation was at Whitby. It was a double house: a community of men and another of women, with the chapel in between, and Hilda as the governor of both; and it was a great center of English learning, one which produced five bishops (during Hilda's lifetime or that of the Abbey?). Here a stable-boy, Caedmon, was moved to compose religious poems in the Anglo-Saxon tongue, most of them metrical paraphrases of narratives from Genesis and the Gospels.

The Celtic peoples of Britain had heard the Gospel well before 300 AD, but in the 400's and 500's a massive invasion of Germanic peoples (Angles, Jutes, and Saxons) forced the native Celts out of what is now England and into Wales, Ireland, and Scotland. The invaders were pagans, and missionaries were sent to them in the north and west by the Celts, and in the south and east by Rome and other churches on the continent of Europe.

Roman and Celtic traditions differed, not in doctrine, but on such questions as the proper way of calculating the date of Easter, and the proper style of haircut and dress for a monk. It was, in particular, highly desirable that Christians, at least in the same area, should celebrate Easter at the same time; and it became clear that the English Church would have to choose between the old Celtic customs which it had inherited from before 300, and the customs of continental Europe and in particular of Rome that missionaries from there had brought with them. In 664 the Synod of Whitby met at that monastery to consider the matter, and it was decided to follow Roman usage.

Hilda herself greatly preferred the Celtic customs in which she had been reared, but once the decision had been made she used her moderating influence in favor of its peaceful acceptance. Her influence was considerable; kings and commoners alike came to her for advice. She was urgent in promoting the study of the Scriptures and the thorough education of the clergy. She died 17 November 680.